Understanding Retention & Turnover is very important and should be grasped with diligent approaches. At Humba-HR-Consultants we realise that in these economic hardships there are approaches that are very vital and effective measures should be implemented to get the best outcome. Employers need to understand their rates of labour turnover
and how they affect the organisation’s performance. An appreciation of the
levels of turnover across occupations, locations and particular groups of
employees can help to inform a comprehensive resourcing strategy. You’ll find
here information on retaining talent, staff retention strategies, labour
turnover and turnover costs.
Employee retention refers to the ability of an organisation
to retain its employees. Employee retention can be represented by a simple
statistic (for example, a retention rate of 80% usually indicates that an
organisation kept 80% of its employees in a given period). However, many
consider employee retention as relating to the efforts by which employers
attempt to retain employees in their workforce. In this sense, retention
becomes the strategies rather than the outcome.
In a business setting, the goal of employers is usually to
decrease employee turnover, thereby decreasing training costs, recruitment
costs and loss of talent and organisational knowledge. By implementing lessons
learned from key organisational behaviour concepts employers can improve
retention rates and decrease the associated costs of high turnover. However,
this isn't always the case. Employers can seek "positive turnover"
whereby they aim to maintain only those employees who they consider to be high performers.
Employee turnover can be disruptive, expensive and affect
team morale. Employees leave for many reasons, and it is generally not because
they want more money or better benefits. There are a range of other reasons
that will result in the employee making that decision to stay or leave.
Within our business we screen and interview thousands of
candidates and during this process we are able to ascertain the reasons why
employees choose to leave their current jobs and seek additional opportunities.
Our observations are supported by a study of 12,000
employees1 where it was found that, in order of frequency, people will leave
one company and go to another for the following reasons:
- exciting work and challenges
- career growth, learning and development
- working with great people
- fair pay
- supportive management/good boss
- being recognised, valued and respected
- benefits
- meaningful work and making a difference
- pride in the organisation, its mission and its products
- great work environment and culture
- autonomy, creativity and sense of control
- flexibility
- location
- job security and stability
- diverse, changing work assignments
- fun on the job
- being part of a team
- responsibility
- loyalty, commitment to the organisation or coworkers
- inspiring leadership
These results are backed up by a body of research that
highlights that even if employees are paid well above the market rates and
incentives with a range of monetary bonuses they will still leave if they
feel that they are either not enhancing their skill set or they don’t have the
social bonds to keep them in the workplace.
The reasons that staff leave vary between departments and
companies. The best way of ascertaining the reasons why employees are leaving
your company can be obtained from an ‘exit interview’. Surprisingly only 10% of
managers will conduct a formal in-depth exit interview following a resignation.
This is more than a quick ‘thanks for working with us and all the best in the
new job’ chat, but a structured series of probing questions that are specific
to both the job and the individual and designed to elicit the maximum amount of
useful information. This knowledge can then be used to assess the workplace and
make improvements to prevent additional resignations.
Exit interview questions include the following:
Is the job that you were doing what you expected following
the information we gave you during the interview?
What additional information should we be giving new
employees regarding the scope of the job that they are being interviewed for?
What were the best aspects of the job?
What aspects would you like to see improved?
Were you supported with a good induction and initial
training?
What advice would you be giving to the next person in your
role?
What types of candidates do you think are best suited to our
culture?
If we were to rethink this role what other suggestions could
you make?
Staff turnover is expensive. You have spent time recruiting
committed and talented employees and if these employees leave the entire
business is affected.
A study2 found that the turnover cost for every employee who
leaves ranges from 90% to 200% of their annual salary. Highly skilled
professionals can cost up to 5 times their salary.
In assessing the cost of replacing an employee consideration
needs to be given to:
- the business lost when the role is vacant
- the disruption to an existing smooth-functioning team when existing employees are required to take up the departed employees workload
- work put on hold until a replacement is found
- lost customers and business opportunities because relationships have been severed
- loss of shared knowledge
- lost supplier relationships
- lowered morale and productivity of existing employees
- the costs involved in hiring – advertising, agency fees, management time involved in interviewing and selection testing
- the direct employment costs of the new hire – salaries, sign-on bonuses, moving allowances, superannuation, workers compensation, payroll tax, office furniture, IT equipment.
- the time it takes to train a new person
- the cost associated with the socialisation of the new person into the group
- the gains made by competitors by employing your employees
It is a useful exercise to calculate these costs for your
particular business. You will be aware of the significance of the role that is
vacant, the business that you are losing and the disruption that the vacancy is
causing. These costs can be considerable and can be many millions of dollars
when significant accounts go to competitors.
Consider how much money your organisation would save by
reducing turnover and how more effectively your organisation could use the
dollars associated with recruiting and training new employees e.g. employee
development and enrichment programmes.
There are many implications when someone leaves an
organisation, but consider the following scenarios:
When a sales rep leaves territories are vacant and the doctors
are receiving the competitor’s messages, therefore losing market share.
When a product manager leaves supplier relationships are
lost, the new product manager does not have the personal chemistry to work
effectively with the advertising people; is unfamiliar with the marketing mix
and overall brand strategy so therefore competitive opportunities are lost.
When a senior manager leaves there is a loss of high level
networks with key decision makers therefore business takes longer and can be
more costly (the best deals cannot be negotiated because the personal
relationships are not there).
When a CRA leaves, clinical trial project management
milestones are not met, local investigators lose confidence, regulatory
timelines are lengthened, local health economics data is not being collected
and the entire pre-marketing strategy is affected.
When regulatory or health economics staff leave
relationships with both the TGA and head office are lost, resulting in delayed
submissions.
When the receptionist leaves the phone does not get answered
resulting in lost business; or an inexperienced receptionist cannot identify
key callers or visitors resulting in a decrease in customer service and lost
business.
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW PROCESS IN MAXIMISING STAFF
RETENTION
Maximising staff retention saves the company money. There
are a range of initiatives to minimise turnover and it starts with the
interview process. Candidates become attracted to the vacancy because they have
seen the advertising and have heard positive reports about the company in the
marketplace. Creating and nurturing these positive thoughts within the
candidate marketplace, and thus increasing the pool of candidates available for
interview, are central to a company’s Recruitment Brand Management strategy.
When devising a Recruitment Brand campaign the following
questions should be asked:
What impressions do the candidates have of our company?
What types of people suit our organisational culture?
What is the personality of our department?
What are the key benefits of working for the company?
How will these benefits be communicated?
Answers to these questions then drive the advertising
strategy from the text of the ad through to the entire feel of the campaign.
Effective advertising is aligned to the overall branding strategy and
communicates the right messages to the right audiences in order to bring
candidates in for interview.
The initial interview is an important aspect of the
candidate’s introduction to the company, however many managers treat this
interview too casually.
Behaviourally based interviewing is the strongest technique
to assess a candidate’s suitability for a particular role. The premise here is
that past behaviour and performance is the best predictor of future
performance. This can be achieved by asking candidates prepared questions,
probing for fuller answers, understanding what the candidate is capable of
doing and understanding what the candidate wants to do.
During the structured interview interviewers want to find
out how the candidates have handled various situations, what they did and the
results of those actions. They want to uncover the true nature of the
candidate’s knowledge, motivations and values. With this insight an assessment
can be made in terms of the candidate’s organisational fit. If the candidate is
the wrong person to add to your existing group they won’t form the necessary
informal networks to share knowledge and enhance group productivity and
turnover will be an issue.
To augment the interview process a number of employment
tests can be used including:
IT and Office skills
Role plays
Writing tests
Presentations
Analysis of papers
Psychological tests
Sales aptitude tests
Management and leadership assessments.
These tests can be invaluable in reducing turnover because
the employer can gain an accurate understanding of the candidate’s skill set so
there is no misunderstanding once they have joined the company. If they are
relaxed in a particular area then training can be given during the initial
induction period, thus facilitating the candidate’s smooth introduction into
the company.
Further, to decrease turnover it is necessary to ensure that
the candidates have a good experience throughout the entire interview process.
How they see the company in the future will depend on how they remember their
first experiences.
With successful candidates it is advised to move them
quickly through the interview process (good candidates have high expectations
of quality and service and don’t favourably view delays); to take time to
clarify expectations so there is no misunderstanding of what the role involves;
to excite the candidates but not to oversell the job; and to stay close to the
candidates after the second interview and during the offer process continuing
to probe for attitude, motivation and organisational fit.
Once employed, new recruits should have a good induction and
socialisation experience. This involves meeting with other employees,
understanding the structure of the company, what the different employees are
responsible for, how they are expected to interact with employees in other
departments, who to go to for help, how to use the office IT and telephone
systems, and training in SOPs. During this period employees will also learn how
to socially adapt to their new workplace. They will need to understand the
social norms of acceptable behaviour and the unwritten rules for interaction.
Without this knowledge they may make social mistakes that will affect their
smooth introduction.
Following an effective induction employees then form a
psychological contract with the company to deliver what is required. The new
employees then identify with the new company and build productive relationships
with their management, peer group and subordinates. If this is followed structurally then the best bespoke strategy will be effectively put in place.
Interesting views and well articulated presentation.
ReplyDelete